Double indemnity

Viewers nix Zionist Fourth Estate

In the primary age demographic of 25 to 54 years of age, CNN lost 59 percent of its viewers, and MSNBC lost 52 percent.  Which of course means the two networks are losing precisely the demographic that drives advertising revenue.  Are you paying attention Los Angeles Times.  You either practice journalism, not the schlock that you’re publishing on Sandy Hook, or you disappear.  Question numero uno where is the Sandy Hook surveillance tape and why hasn’t it been released to the public?  Just basic journalism.  Why are the authorities fighting tooth and nail to suppress information on this mass murder?  I have on my own website identified known crisis actors being interviewed by CNN about Sandy Hook as “grieving parents.”  Why haven’t they been run down by the press?  For the information of real journalists that wish to do their job:

Sealed records in Sandy Hook cover-up

First they sealed the educational records of James “Joker” Holmes.  This was important because Mr. Holmes’s research involved mind control and “flicker fusion.” 

Indeed it was Mr. Holmes work in temporal illusions that attracted attention from colleges and elite science camps. 

Now we learn the state of Connecticut is seeking to seal the records in the Sandy Hook massacre.  Meaning the ballistics of the case will never be released, nor the surveillance footage of then newly installed cameras by principal Dawn Hochsprung, supposedly killed in the attack. 

In what free country does anyone seal the records to a mass murder of general public concern?  Totalitarian ones, yes.  To conceal facts and other unwanted revelations of danger to the state.  But not in countries that are truly democratic and governed by laws.

All the more reason to suspect Sandy Hook had no real investigation.  And without the latter there is no reason to trust the assertions of the Connecticut police.  Sandy Hook rests upon the quick sand of little empirical evidence. 

Though we do know for a fact there were two men fleeing in the field adjacent to the elementary school captured on helicopter video, and that one person of interest was placed in a police cruiser witnessed by many onlookers.

Then there was the sighting of Jennifer Sexton Greenberg, by the way one of my favorite crisis actresses, caught on tape giving an interview to CNN as grieving Sandy Hook parent.  All this effort to invalidate the 2nd Amendment.  Here’s Jenny on CNN posing as Mrs. Phelps and a comparison photo of her.  The last photo shows her playing the role of author Robbyn Swan.  Perhaps she’ll get a better gig that really showcases her talents.

Jenny and hubbyMrs. Phelps (Top panel)jennysexton67yt6Jenny

Jenny as Robbyn Swan

Robbyn Swan

Advertisements

What goes around comes around

Why it won’t be different this time . . .

“Goyim (gentiles, non-Jews) were born only to serve us. Without that, they have no place in the world – only to serve the People of Israel. Why are gentiles needed? They will work, they will plow, they will reap. We will sit like an effendi and eat. That is why gentiles were created.”
Rabbi Ovadia Yosef 2010

Yes, there were reasons why Germany descended into collective madness.  The Zionists have positioned the U.S. for economic collapse at a time of their choosing.  They are fomenting sectarian conflict to complete Hitler’s project of driving the Jews back to the promised lands.  They might even succeed again—because of the Jews themselves.  I call it the One Percent Solution.

Tom Turkey economics

The wages of neofeudalism . . .

Thanksgiving

For this Turkey of an Economy

Charles Hugh Smith has provided a concise discussion of the wages of sin that inhabit debt serfdom. 

Gross Domestic Product is approximately $16-17 trillion.  If the economy returned to trend growth of 3 to 3.5 percent, the economy would produce an additional $500 billion in output.  That however is a pipe dream under true accounting, if you use more accurate measures of inflation.  As it is with the Bureau of Labor Statistics measure of inflation, the country is lucky to have 2 percent GDP growth.

Unfortunately the debt service and interest on accumulated debt amounts to some $2.7 trillion.  Meaning the burden of debt is 5 to 6 times greater than normal growth. 

The Fed appears to be monetizing the greater part of the debt interest gap, and disguising this monetization by not reporting M3, once upon a time the widest measure of money growth. 

This financial system will eventually implode with the collapse of the dollar, a point made often by economist Paul Craig Roberts.  Anyway, dear readers you can find Smith’s article here. 

It is the worth the time and effort to read and makes clear why, barring a sudden collapse, 80 percent of the income distribution will be driven below the level of subsistence if the Federal Reserve does not change course.  The greater part of the debt interest gap being paid in a loss of purchasing power of the fiat currency as the Federal Reserve prints to infinity.

Being driven below self subsistence is the flash point, in my humble opinion, for revolution by the new peasants of debt serfdom.   Then, unfortunately, there will be a settling of accounts as there was after Weimar Germany’’s hyperinflationary depression.  Human nature being what it is. If we’re lucky it will be of the slow motion hyper-stagflation variety.

The golden glow state

Rain water radiation 5 times normal in 2012

Radiation readings of rain water sample.  Beyond hazmat levels (for California Highway Patrol spills and accidents).  Personally, expecting large die offs like the 2012 seal-sea lion starvation.

Peace in our time?

There is no discretionary income left

So many people are suffering from sticker shock at Obamacare’s inflated premiums that they’re holding onto their money and cutting back wherever they can. Consumer holiday spending is likely to take a hit. Anxious retailers reportedly are starting to offer discounts early.—Jim Powell, Forbes Magazine, November 27, 2013

Barack Obama’s signature act will be the Iran nuclear pact, and not Obamacare since the latter is strictly speaking unaffordable.  As I’ve said, I will settle for peace in my time to declare the Obama administration a success.  Without peace the U.S. is unmistakably headed for a fiscal crack-up along the lines of Greece or any of the PIIGS.  Americans have come to expect the state to be able to dispense salvation to the masses.  Strictly speaking completely un-Protestant.  This is what has taken place because of amalgamation.

I love L.A.

Barry spending a lot of time in L.A. . . .

Commentary on: “It’s a setup.”

Hollywoodism has long run interference for the state.  Director John Ford did it during World War II.  It is called propaganda, but the trick is to masquerade the propaganda as entertainment, to suspend the critical faculties of the public.  Television is perhaps the premier medium for doing so.  So the fellow who posted the below video is right, “it’s a setup” but one with a long tradition.  Certainly going as far back as World War II, and the writing of Orwell’s 1984. 

The below video would appear to be an example of subliminal suggestion.  It is of course no accident that at this point in history Aurora and Sandy Hook appear in the same movie at just about the time of mass murders using supposedly AR-15s.   I would strongly argue that there was a coup d’etat in the United States on September 11, 2001.  Unlike the earlier coup carried out in Texas in 1963, this one was fascisocialist.  The below video being a public relations campaign to sell gun control and eviscerate the Constitution of the United States.

Whereas John Ford’s propaganda was nationalistic, the current propaganda is directed at American nationalism.  It is designed to pave the way for internationalism, globalism, or what some have referred to as a New World Order.  But it is not new, but rather the fascist-Bolshevik amalgamation of world domination by a tiny minority – indeed Hollywoodism is the observable in situ actions that point unmistakably to the underlying moral order the Zionist propaganda industry wishes to bring about.

It is made witnessable in the organizing and actions of the members of Hollywoodism and their daft ad hominem attacks on Muslims and other people who have questioned their Nazi objectives.  Which is to say the same techniques by which Nazis succeeded in demonizing Jews, is now applied to creating the demon of Islamofascism and their sophomoric ad hominem attacks on critics—the most comical being “he’s a conspiracy theorist” or he’s “anti-Semitic.”

So dear reader, brace yourself for more slapstick portrayals of minorities so that the Zionists can promote their “New American Century” rubbish—that really benefits no one other than Israel.  I read a very amusing piece by Gilad Atzmon in which people refer to Netanyahu as a believer in the “Protocols of  Zion” because he actually believes he can manipulate the world by manipulating the United States.  Why perhaps, Barack Obama was summoned to Hollywood once again to explain himself.

And to think some mistakenly took Obama to be another Moses, that might deliver us from Zionist bondage.  Without Jarrett their wouldn’t be any backbone in Washington at all.

Very long odds

Is it really just coincidence? . . .

The odds on Aurora and Sandy Hook showing up in movie randomly

Now internet posters have noted that both the names of Aurora and Sandy Hook are visible in the movie The Dark Knight Rises.  Now what are the odds or chances of that occurring randomly? 

In the United States there are around 19,000 to 25,000 municipalities in the states.  Some of these are unincorporated areas.  Therefore a conservative estimate of the number of possible outcomes I would  estimate to be 19,000.  If the selection of Aurora and Sandy Hook were both to occur randomly the odds of their selection would be astronomical.  By my own estimates the odds would be 361 million to 22.  

Now there may be some duplication in city names, but I would estimate it won’t alter significantly odds as astronomical as the above.  For example, there are about 22 cities named Aurora in the U.S.  I do not know of any other cities or villages named Sandy Hook.  That would then make the probability for selecting Aurora and Sandy Hook = 22/19000 * 1/19000 or odds of 361 million to 22.  An obvious very low probability.  In fact the odds of you being struck by lightning is only 700,000 to one, which is to say you’re much more likely to be struck by lightning than you would be to have these two particular cities paired together in a movie.

In other words the chances of this particular pair of city names being randomly selected from all cities in the United States is virtually nil.  But judge for yourself.  The two cities, sites of mass killings, somehow just happen to appear in the Dark Knight Rises?  And at this point in history which I have not factored into the calculations of the odds which would make them even longer.

Now to the gun grabbers I say this: there is a way to change the Constitution, submit a Constitutional amendment and then get it ratified by three quarter of the states.  No law that runs counter to the Constitution will ever be recognized as legitimate—especially by gun enthusiasts. 

Go through the proper channels and get it ratified through a referendum that expresses the will of the people.  If you can’t accomplish it constitutionally then I would submit you really don’t have the arguments on your side.   The idea that Barack Obama intends to ban guns on the basis of executive order will be strongly resisted.  Political pundit Pat Buchanan even asserts it would lead to a revolution.

I have noticed that the same people who are pushing gun control are also the same crowd bailing out the banksters and their criminal practices.  Before we criminalize gun owners, I say let’s try the criminal bankers for actual malfeasance beginning with the inside trading of people like Dianne Feinstein.  Gun violence is a problem, but no more so than financial corruption that destroys an economy or the pharmaceutical industry pedaling dangerous drugs like Selective Serotonin Re-uptake Inhibitors.  As the Harvard Health Publica notes of SSRIs:

One reason for concern is the increasing number of children and adolescents receiving prescriptions for antidepressants. An analysis of clinical trials in patients under age 18 found that SSRIs raised the risk of suicidal thinking when compared with a placebo. Many studies have followed, and although results vary, there is a consistent trend. When compared with a placebo, all antidepressants, including SSRIs, seem to double the risk of suicidal thinking, from 1%–2% to 2%–4%, in both children and adults.–May 2005 issue of the Harvard Mental Health Letter

Indeed!