Do Jews run the main stream media?Before writing

Do Jews run the main stream media?
Before writing about the main stream media, I usually preface it with some facts from a post in April 2012. Tomorrow’s post will be a companion piece to my previous post: “Do Jews run Hollywood.” If they do, and I think the evidence suggests they do, then the question becomes have they been good stewards of the Fourth Estate? Have they hindered democratic discussion through systematic distortion of communication? Here the cases of people like Rick Sanchez, Ashley Banfield, Amber Lyon, Sheila MacVicar, and Peter Arnett loom large. Certainly if you cannot discuss whether Jews run the mass media, in particular the news portion, then democracy does not exist. What are the facts?
The following is a short list of Jews in the main stream media:

MORTIMER ZUCKERMAN, owner of NY Daily News, US News & World Report and chair of the Conference of Presidents of Major Jewish American Organizations, one of the largest pro-Israel lobbying groups.

LESLIE MOONVES, president of CBS television, great-nephew of David Ben-Gurion, and co-chair with Norman Ornstein of the Advisory Committee on Public Interest Obligation of Digital TV Producers, appointed by Clinton.

JONATHAN MILLER, chair and CEO of AOL division of AOL-Time-Warner

NEIL SHAPIRO, president of NBC News

JEFF GASPIN, Executive Vice-President, Programming, NBC

DAVID WESTIN, president of ABC News

SUMNER REDSTONE, CEO of Viacom, “world’s biggest media giant” (Economist, 11/23/2) owns Viacom cable, CBS and MTVs all over the world, Blockbuster video rentals and Black Entertainment TV.

MICHAEL EISNER, major owner of Walt Disney, Capitol Cities, ABC.

RUPERT MURDOCH, Owner Fox TV, New York Post, London Times, News of the World (Jewish mother)

MEL KARMAZIN, president of CBS

DON HEWITT, Exec. Director, 60 Minutes, CBS

JEFF FAGER, Exec. Director, 60 Minutes II. CBS

DAVID POLTRACK, Executive Vice-President, Research and Planning, CBS

SANDY KRUSHOW, Chair, Fox Entertainment

LLOYD BRAUN, Chair, ABC Entertainment

BARRY MEYER, chair, Warner Bros.

SHERRY LANSING. President of Paramount Communications and Chairman of Paramount Pictures’ Motion Picture Group.


BRAD SIEGEL., President, Turner Entertainment.

PETER CHERNIN, second in-command at Rupert Murdoch’s News. Corp., owner of Fox TV

MARTY PERETZ, owner and publisher of the New Republic, which openly identifies itself as pro-Israel. Al Gore credits Marty with being his “mentor.”

ARTHUR O. SULZBERGER, JR., publisher of the NY Times, the Boston Globe and other publications.

WILLIAM SAFIRE, syndicated columnist for the NYT.

TOM FRIEDMAN, syndicated columnist for the NYT.

CHARLES KRAUTHAMMER, syndicated columnist for the Washington Post. Honored by Honest, website monitoring “anti-Israel media.”

RICHARD COHEN, syndicated columnist for the Washington Post

JEFF JACOBY, syndicated columnist for the Boston Globe

NORMAN ORNSTEIN, American Enterprise Inst., regular columnist for USA Today, news analyst for CBS, and co-chair with Leslie Moonves of the Advisory Committee on Public Interest Obligation of Digital TV Producers, appointed by Clinton.

ARIE FLEISCHER, Dubya’s press secretary.

STEPHEN EMERSON, every media outlet’s first choice as an expert on domestic terrorism.

DAVID SCHNEIDERMAN, owner of the Village Voice and the New Times network of “alternative weeklies.”

DENNIS LEIBOWITZ, head of Act II Partners, a media hedge fund

KENNETH POLLACK, for CIA analysts, director of Saban Center for Middle East Policy, writes op-eds in NY Times, New Yorker

BARRY DILLER, chair of USA Interactive, former owner of Universal Entertainment

KENNETH ROTH, Executive Director of Human Rights Watch

RICHARD LEIBNER, runs the N.S. Bienstock talent agency, which represents 600 news personalities such as Dan Rather, Dianne Sawyer and Bill O’Reilly.

TERRY SEMEL, CEO, Yahoo, former chair, Warner Bros.

MARK GOLIN, VP and Creative Director, AOL

WARREN LIEBERFORD, Pres., Warner Bros. Home Video Div. of AOL- TimeWarner

JEFFREY ZUCKER, President of NBC Entertainment

JACK MYERS, NBC, chief.NYT 5.14.2

SANDY GRUSHOW, chair of Fox Entertainment

GAIL BERMAN, president of Fox Entertainment

STEPHEN SPIELBERG, co-owner of Dreamworks

JEFFREY KATZENBERG, co-owner of Dreamworks

DAVID GEFFEN, co-owner of Dreamworks

LLYOD BRAUN, chair of ABC Entertainment

JORDAN LEVIN, president of Warner Bros. Entertainment

MAX MUTCHNICK, co-executive producer of NBC’s “Good Morning Miami”

DAVID KOHAN, co-executive producer of NBC’s “Good Morning Miami”

HOWARD STRINGER, chief of Sony Corp. of America

AMY PASCAL, chair of Columbia Pictures

JOEL KLEIN, chair and CEO of Bertelsmann’s American operations

ROBERT SILLERMAN, founder of Clear Channel Communications

BRIAN GRADEN, president of MTV entertainment

IVAN SEIDENBERG, CEO of Verizon Communications

WOLF BLITZER, host of CNN’s Late Edition

LARRY KING, host of Larry King Live

TED KOPPEL, host of ABC’s Nightline



MIKE WALLACE, Host of CBS, 60 Minutes


MICHAEL LEDEEN, editor of National Review

BRUCE NUSSBAUM, editorial page editor, Business Week

DONALD GRAHAM, Chair and CEO of Newsweek and Washington Post, son of

CATHERINE GRAHAM MEYER, former owner of the Washington Post

HOWARD FINEMAN, Chief Political Columnist, Newsweek

WILLIAM KRISTOL, Editor, Weekly Standard, Exec. Director 
Project for a New American Century (PNAC)

RON ROSENTHAL, Managing Editor, San Francisco Chronicle

PHIL BRONSTEIN, Executive Editor, San Francisco Chronicle,

RON OWENS, Talk Show Host, KGO (ABC-Capitol Cities, San Francisco)

JOHN ROTHMAN, Talk Show Host, KGO (ABC-Capitol Cities, San Francisco)

MICHAEL SAVAGE, Talk Show Host, KFSO (ABC-Capitol Cities, San Francisco) Syndicated in 100 markets

MICHAEL MEDVED, Talk Show Host, on 124 AM stations

DENNIS PRAGER, Talk Show Host, nationally syndicated from LA. Has Israeli flag on his home page.

BEN WATTENBERG, Moderator, PBS Think Tank.

ANDREW LACK, president of NBC

DANIEL MENAKER, Executive Director, Harper Collins

DAVID REMNICK, Editor, The New Yorker

NICHOLAS LEHMANN, writer, the New York

HENRICK HERTZBERG, Talk of the Town editor, The New Yorker

SAMUEL NEWHOUSE JR, and DONALD NEWHOUSE own Newhouse Publications, includes 26 newspapers in 22 cities; the Conde Nast magazine group, includes The New Yorker; Parade, the Sunday newspaper supplement; American City Business Journals, business newspapers published in more than 30 major cities in America; and interests in cable television programming and cable systems serving 1 million homes.

DONALD NEWHOUSE, chairman of the board of directors, Associated Press.

PETER R KANN, CEO, Wall Street Journal, Barron’s

RALPH J. & BRIAN ROBERTS, Owners, Comcast-ATT Cable TV.


A reasonably objective person would conclude that Jews do indeed constitute a large percentage of the top executive positions that make decisions in the main stream media. The above list was compiled by Judaism Online. If you cannot speak openly about such matters you simply do not have free speech. The question is of course not whether they’re Jewish, but whether they have been good for American democracy?
Tomorrow I’ll try to try to broach that pressing question (pun intended).
The best discussion of Jewish control of the media was written by Israel Shamir entitled Midas Ears. Shamir’s article can be found at

A Zionist Fourth EstateThis story had been deleted

A Zionist Fourth Estate

This story had been deleted by

Google and now reposted

Part I

The Zionist command and control economy is the silly notion you can guide an economy through monetary policy, as opposed to savings, investment, and production. I call it Zionist because it largely benefits financial speculation that like the main stream media is also dominated by Jews. That evidence is given in yesterday’s post. The last two Federal Reserve chiefs personify this ethnic warfare, Alan Greenspan and Ben Shalom Bermanke. Policies of rank money printing were then used to support wars that largely benefitted Israel (the removal of enemies on both its eastern and northern flank) and destabilized the Middle East. As we’ll see this resulted in more terrorism, not less.

On matters of general interest policies of this sort failed to either provide national security or prosperity. So between 2002 and 2012 the national debt went from $6.2 to $16 trillion. Unemployment hovers around 8 percent but is probably much worse given the labor force participation rate has not improved markedly, stuck at about 64 percent. This has wreaked havoc on America’s prosperity. I think the numbers back up this assertion.

A command and control economy is nothing more than centralized socialist planning. Though in this case for bankers. Socialism, however, does not work. Not for the Russians, Chinese, and French. And certainly not for incompetent Zionist apparatchiks of the sort now running the Federal Reserve—Ben Bernanke being exhibit A. You assume incompetence but perhaps venality is closer to the truth.

As stated in the previous post, if you calculate inflation in the manner it was done before Bill Clinton came to office, it trends much higher, as you would expect because of America’s wars unpaid for by taxes, and the GDP is much lower. In fact, as John Williams at shows, real GDP has been going south since 2005. Meaning the country has been in recession now for 8 years. The Zionists attempted to finesse the costs of the wars through rank money printing. They got away with this scam because the press simply reported what was released by the Bureau of Labor Statistics as opposed to asking whether the measuring instrument used by the BLS was accurate.

Was this a mistake, or worse, the Jewish dominated press going along with government propaganda because it furthered the strategic interests of Israel? And why would you? Yet how can you take an instrument for inflation seriously when it systematically excludes food and energy from the cost of living? But as Joseph Goebbels remarked if you tell a lie often and long enough people will believe it, thereby obfuscating the policy mistakes of the government.

As noted elsewhere on this blogsite, this was also the tactic employed by German authorities following World War I, they convinced themselves that printing money or monetizing did not cause inflation. They were wrong because it ultimately did. But they also did so because printing money stokes the fires of financial speculation. A problem to both post World War I Germany and the United states.

The gag on our trading partners is that we exchange paper emblazoned with dead presidents for valuable goods requiring labor and the expenditure of their scarce capital. For the Chinese, with the dollar losing value daily this exchange amounts to paying the U.S. tribute. Fortunately, for them, the Chinese do not believe the claptrap emitted by the BLS and are taking steps to insulate themselves from the folly of what I will call the Zionist Fourth Reich.

Zionist because Jews form the backbone of the too big to fail banks, the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, and most importantly the ranks of the main stream media. Well supported by the research of Judaism Online.As a social movement, Zionism actually shared much in common with the Nazis movement: a well articulated ideology, organization, and social context in which the financial system was in crisis. And there is always the link between Nazis like Carl Schmitt and Zionist Leo Strausss to consider, and the fact that the two factions worked closely on the Haavara transfer agreement, that allowed German Jews to emigrate to Palestine in the ‘30s. But I digress.

Trading paper for actually tangible valuable goods embodying labor, to say the least, works to our advantage and contains hyperinflation until that time the world dumps dollars. But dump it they will, because it does not further their national interests. And that’s not far off as the below report indicates.

The U.S Dollar is quickly losing its status as the world reserve currency. Five of the top ten economies in the world, plus a few others, no longer use the dollar as an intermediary currency for trade. This trend poses a huge risk to the dollar and the United States along with it.—Activist Post, April 1, 2013.

That countries like China have put up with it for so long is only because they must keep people employed. Now they are striking bilateral trade agreements that exclude the dollar. Unlike laid back Americans, Countries like China fear their populace, lest they begin contemplating regime change.

Americans so the Zionists believe have become domesticated poodles. Former Israel Prime Minister Ariel Sharon often made statements like this exchange with Shimon Peres: “. . . every time we do something you tell me Americans will do this and will do that. I want to tell you something very clear, don’t worry about American pressure on Israel, we, the Jewish people control America, and the Americans know it.” Enough said.

Regular readers to this blog might view this as a broken record, but frankly I do not. You cannot spin a forty year decline in real wages and per capita income as a one off event. To the contrary it reflects a secular structural shift in America’s economic fortunes. Military interventions are not a sign of strength, but of dissipation—unlimited credit creation. It was the transition from production to speculation to a permanent war economy where truth was the first casualty, that undermined democracy and the country’s ability to change course.


If the dollar is dropped as a reserve currency, the outcome will actually be an awakening to America’s undeveloped status. This state of affairs should have been reported, investigated, discussed, and then finally voted upon by the American people. The long term decline in real per capita income was neither a Democrat or Republican issue, but occurred during the administrations of both.

Democracy is at best a flawed form of political organization subject to prevarication, as noted by Nazi jurist Carl Schmitt. To neutralize lying the press must be independent. Independence is best produce through competition and not the concentration of media through integration of print, television, and radio communication.

Media simply cannot repeat the palaver disseminated by government agencies like the “official rate of inflation,” or World Trade Center Tower 7 was felled by fires, that you must destroy a village to save it, etc., etc. Americans were not so much domesticated poodles, as they were miseducated by our universities and misinformed by the Zionist Fourth Estate. The obvious question virtually ignored was whether unilateral wars of aggression made the world safer. The state department itself provided the answer:

The report said there were 11,111 [terrorist] attacks that caused 14,602 deaths in 2005 alone. Those figures stand in stark contrast to previous State Department reports, which cited 208 terrorist attacks that caused 625 deaths in 2003, and 3,168 attacks that caused 1,907 deaths and 6,704 injuries in 2004.

This was astounding, but virtually unreported by the press. The wars had amped terrorism not muted it. That is, the most important role of the press, deliberation and discussion, was systematically short circuited by the very people who claimed they were democracy’s greatest defenders. As we’ll see Monday such claims are not supported by the facts. The Zionist Fourth Estate has offered fake stories for Bahrain and Iran, excluded adverse stories to two administrations (Republican and Democratic), and accepted money for tailored news content (exposed by former CNN reporter Amber Lyon). The Zionist Fourth Estate is not fostering democracy but its exact opposite—distorted communication and soft core totalitarianism.

Few outside the country take American journalism seriously any longer, filled as it is with the likes of George Stephanopoulos, Chelsea Clinton, and Mika Brzezinski, to name just a few of the ringers informing the public. Meanwhile real reporters like Peter Arnett, Amber Lyon, and Rick Sanchez can no longer work in the industry. No doubt we can look forward to Sasha and Malia on the CIA public relations outlet, ABC, in the future.

But the press also had help from American academia (Ben Bernanke and Paul Krugman being prime examples). Tenure was the means by which the establishment weeded out alternative interpretations in higher education. This has been going on since the ‘60s. I myself witnessed such witch hunts and McCarthyism of Angela Davis at UCLA, a student of Herbert Marcuse, a German social theorist.

It went beyond simple red baiting to actual censorship. The type of mindless self censorship we saw in the reporting of 9/11 and the gloss of drone strikes upon two American citizens without judicial review. We have not seen a widening of democracy in the country that claims to be spreading democracy. This was particularly the case in economics where the interpretations of the Chicago school (i.e., the University of Chicago) has reigned supreme for 60+ years.*

Since truth is the first casualty of war, and America has opted to be a warfare state, there is very little truth in public affairs. Young reporters and even young soldiers like Bradley Manning are discovering this reality every day. And ergo little democracy—i.e., unconstrained discourse. The Bolsheviks also did their share of voting, for party stooges, and five year plans, but no political scientist I know would mistake casting ballots in and of itself as democracy. Perhaps the democracy of Carl Schmitt, but hardly that of Jefferson and Rousseau. Martial law now looms instead even as the circuses continue. A great country reduced to fluff, worshipping American Idol, Justin Bieber, and Hollywoodism. More’s the pity.

But as always give credit where credit is due for America’s relative decline: the Zionist Fourth Estate and their goyimsycophants (Cheney, Rumsfeld, Bush, and Obama). It was just a brilliant takedown from 9/11 to weapons of mass destruction, and finally the murder of American citizens by fiat declaration. Through it all the press nary raised an objection; it went along to get along in democracy’s demolition.

The consequence was greater instability in world affairs as measured by just the increase in terrorist acts after 2003. But this act of political folly also had an economic cost, financial speculation as a result of funding wars on credit. I would have to agree with Shadowstats’ John Williams, this is headed toward a serious bout of inflation if not high double digit inflation. The austerity America is enacting is not austerity at all, but rather a slight slowing down of increases in spending, but it increases nonetheless. Keynesianism at this late date should be seen objectively for what it is: a replay of Rudolf Havenstein and the inevitable scourge of inflation.

At what point did the Germans realized they had been had? When we started seeing assassinations. In the immediate period after the Balfour Declaration giving the Zionists a homeland at Germany’s expense. That event which will be 100 years old in 2016 has become the nightmare of the dead upon the living. I think it is the signature event that changed the 20th century and still has not reached its denouement.

*The number of people from Chicago that exist in the Obama administration, beginning with the president himself, and the previous administration has been duly noted more than once here. David Axelrod, Rahm Emanuel, Hillary Clinton, Paul Wolfowitz in the Bush administration, also Richard Perle have convinced your dear editor that Barack Obama is nothing m0re than a Chicago Neo-CON and a follower of University of Chicago’s Leo Strauss who made lying a noble enterprise. That is to say, these individuals actually hold democracy in contempt as Leo Strauss’s mentor Carl Schmitt did. They are progenitors of the Zionist Fourth Reich, that can indeed be traced to the Third Reich. The antidote to the Zionist Fourth Reich and Zionist Fourth Estate is provided by Juergen Habermas. He provides an ideal of free speech from which you can gauge the distance of Zionist Fourth Reich reporting from redeemable claims to the truth. He was one of the few, in my opinion, that saw the import of Schmitt’s provocation and the lack of response to what was taking place in the Third Reich. But more on that a little later in this series.

Zionist Fourth ReichThis story was also deleted byGoogle

Zionist Fourth Reich

This story was also deleted by

Google and now reposted

Part II

Does the Zionist Fourth Estate (ZFE) promote democracy in its brand of journalism? And does the media serve the interests of a Zionist Fourth Reich warfare state, taking handouts from the State Department and Central Intelligence Agency and parroting their claims. Finally is there a distortion of journalism that benefits the strategic interests of Israel?

The first question whether ZFE promotes democracy is the most interesting and touches on the dialogue between Juergen Habermas and Carl Schmitt on the viability of democracy as a political organization.

If you believe the former, democracy can work if journalism practices approach an ideal speech model, adumbrated in his work. This is because a model for truth or even normative rightness assumes certain universal validity claims that must be redeemed through argumentation, and the closer the actual social context approaches the ideal speech situation the more confidence we can be the consensus is valid or warranted.

That is, ultimately sociology grounds the truth or normative rightness claims. Such questions as inequality thus impinges upon people’s ability to participate in unconstrained discourse. Whether they have an equal opportunity to posit arguments for and against an issue.

At one time it was only people who owned a press that could actually partake in the process of deliberation and discussion ultimately leading to a vote on a given issue. Having to own a press to participate in and of itself compromised the ideal speech situation, and having concentration of the media in fewer and fewer hands constricted democratic participation even further thereby making any consensus less than valid.

Even for science the truth isn’t what the scientist asserts, but what other scientists can support through theoretical coherence and empirical evidence. For example any economic discussion that systematically seeks to exclude the work of Michael Kalecki, Joan Robinson, and Paul Sweezy is less than ideal speech and results in less than a valid consensus. Discourse supported solely by members of the Chicago School of neoliberalism would be just as biased as a medieval discussions of theology solely by the amens of Catholics.

That in turn, brings into focus the question of universal education since to hold your own in the public sphere you must be adequately educated to indeed grasp arguments and offer counter arguments which again refocuses attention upon social inequality. Today, thanks to the internet, we are fortunate to be on the cusp of more people bringing their knowledge and expertise to matters of general interest, like the Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth (A&E) in the case of the attack on the World Trade Center Towers. I think without a doubt the internet has furthered ideal speech and democracy.

By contrast, Carl Schmitt maintains democracy is fatally flawed because of the fact it can be gamed through the simple exercise of lying through your teeth. But this is much less the case as people join the discussion and bring their considerable expertise and knowledge to the discussion as A&E has done for 9/11.

Excluding facts, distorting facts, changing facts are validity claims to truth that can now be challenged through the internet. It is no longer viable to simply assert the towers on 9/11 were felled by fires when thermite found in professional demolitions was found in the dust and debris of the WTC towers, and WTC7 came down in free fall time indicating unmistakably that the structural supports of the 47 story building were cut away simultaneously to achieve near free fall acceleration.

Consequently, in an ideal speech situation you can question the viability, coherence, and elegance of a theory like whether WTC towers were felled by fires or demolition. The former backed by little more than NIST assertion and disseminated by the main stream press prior to a proper investigation of the matter in the immediate aftermath of the 9/11 attack. This stands in opposition to the empirical evidence marshaled by A&E for 9/11 Truth. in support of its demolition theory.

Again any rote parroting of official positions would be questioned in ideal speech, and any so called consensus would not be valid, but rather an indication of distorted communication. Therefore we can see in ideal speech a rational structure where we warrant a theory through theory assessment, the empirical evidence marshaled on behalf of the theory, and even the sincerity of the speaker’s assertions.

Then a rational assessment is used to gauge how close the discussion approached ideal speech in which participants had an equal opportunity to posit arguments, and the moral maturity of actors to submit to the force of the better argument. That is, how well could people symbolically interact to see the other side’s position and strike a consensus with intersubjective validity.

What has been going in American journalism is antithetical to ideal speech and democracy, but very close to Carl Schmitt’s assertion that democracy can be gamed through lies, fake stories, and the exclusion of the facts. In fact we saw all these techniques used in the run up to the Iraq invasion and throughout the years of the Zionist Fourth Estate’s coverage of Israel.

Why I also maintain the ZFE is a follower of Leo Strauss, who was mentored by Carl Schmitt, resulting in distorted communication and invalid consensuses approaching soft core totalitarianism. Unfortunately, the ZFE does hold democracy in contempt and instrumental to always already decided objectives.

It is not democracy, but what Lenin referred to as “democratic centralism,” in which the public is expected to simply rubber stamp policies of an oligarchy. Therefore, let’s review some of the most egregious examples of gaming democracy. It was indeed the latter that permitted National Socialists to capture power that duly impressed Zionists prior to the actual onset of World War II. And why after Hitler assumed power the Zionists worked hand in hand with the Schutzstaffel to move Jews to Palestine, even going so far as touring the country together a fact reported in German papers of the time.

The official SS newspaper, Das Schwarze Korps, proclaimed its support for Zionism in a May 1935 front-page editorial: “The time may not be too far off when Palestine will again be able to receive its sons who have been lost to it for more than a thousand years. Our good wishes, together with official goodwill, go with them.”

Edwin Black who wrote a book on the collaboration of Zionists and National Socialists entitled The Transfer Agreement in 1984 had this to say:

The economic relationship with Germany was indispensable in the creation of the State of Israel. Without Germany and the Nazis, there would have been no “aliyah” to the Holy Land,”

More importantly as Dietrich Bronder documented in his book Before Hitler Came, 1964 states unambiguously that the upper reaches of the Nazis Party had Jewish heritage, and this included:

Adolf Hitler, Rudolf Hess, Reichsmarshall Hermann Goering, Dr. Josef Goebbels, Gregor Strasser, Alfred Rosenberg, Hans Frank, Heinrich Himmler, Reichsminister von Ribbentrop, SS Leader Reinhard Himmler, and Hitler’s bankers, Ritter von Strauss and von Stein.

Yet you will find very very few Americans cognizant of this fact because of ZFE control over the main stream media in the United States, even extending into book publishing. The Zionists who have seized control of the United States since 9/11, not dissimilar to Nazis consolidation of power after the Reichstag fire in 1933, are not liberal democrats except in sheep’s clothing, but dyed in the wool fascists. This excluded fact colors perhaps the biggest canard of all, the 6 million figure for the Shoah or Holocaust. Here the main stream media has employed the tried and true methodology of Joseph Goebbels that if you repeat a lie often enough and long enough then it becomes the truth of the matter.

By contrast a media that approaches ideal speech would have long ago asked: How do we know this to be true? For I believe it is an established fact that the only camp to keep good records of their murders was Auschwitz, a subsidiary of I.G. Farben, the producer of Zyklon B. I personally have no doubt mass murders occurred, but the 6 million figure is pure fabrication simply lifted from pages of papers even before World War II (e.g., from the New York Times, Sept. 8, 1919, p. 6; New York Times, May 7, 1920, p. 11; New York Times, July 20, p. 2). Indeed, it is very curious that the state of Israel has not funded a survey to at least attempt an honest estimate. Then at least we can quibble over the methods employed to produce the death toll. But as it stands presently, the 6 million deaths claimed in the Shoah simply cannot be redeemed through argumentation, and is maintained by Goebbels methodology of simply repeating an assertion over and over.

I sincerely doubt whether even Jews could grant such a claim, but that is precisely what the American main stream media engages in. But for our discussion a clear perturbation away from an ideal speech situation and a less than warranted truth claim.

For the greater part of their distortion we have no further to look than the current case of Amber Lyon, a former reporter for CNN. Ms. Lyon has come forward to accuse CNN of suppressing facts regarding human rights violations in Bahrain, for American access to a base bordering the strategic Strait of Hormuz. She claims that CNN not only fakes stories, but also excludes stories adverse to American foreign policy, but even accepts money to produce content for the U.S. government. That would surely constitute a conflict of interest.

Perhaps in the near future Ms. Lyon will also provide the documentation for her charges. But there are already known cases of distortion through fiat exclusion. For example, nuclear technician Mordechai Vanunu who provided photographic evidence of Israel’s nuclear weapons program in 1986 . The same Israel that now throws rocks from their glass house complaining about Iran’s nuclear power program. But what is important here is that this was a huge story, but little mentioned in the main stream press. Much like the exponential rise in terrorism since our invasion of Iraq. And why? Because of Israel. Just as the Goldstone Report documenting Israeli war crimes during Operation Cast Lead in 2008-2009 was suppressed.

But even Ms. Lyon does not seem to be able to give voice to the fact the Bahrain base is essential for an attack upon Iran’s nuclear facilities that would benefit Israel as much as the United States, and per chance it is the former that CNN takes into consideration in reporting the news; or even fabricating the news. Yes news organizations are not even above fabricating fake news, as in CNN’s Anderson Cooper reports on the Sandy Hook massacre using a blue screen, the projection of an image backdrop. Cooper wasn’t in Newton, but in some studio faking an interview. But then the viewer asks himself what else are they faking—per chance perhaps the massacre itself.

So just as the ZFE creates a chilling effect by attacking legitimate reporting, they also end up raising a validity claim as to the news organization’s sincerity or truthfulness. Now information produced under these conditions does not further veracity, and undermines democracy. I do not think it is any coincidence that CNN’s ratings have plummeted. It is even bad for business. But the bottom line is that Obama’s policies are contrivances whose consensus is maintained through distorted communication and the ZFE. The latter is not set up to promote democracy, but exactly its opposite.

And everything that has occurred since 9/11 echoes a coup d’etat more akin to a fascist takeover replete with its own 9/11 “Reichstag fire” centered around as always a permanent war economy, pretty much like the Third Reich. Where is this going? Down just like the house of cards that was the 1000 years Reich or the so called New American Century. Complete with its own diaspora.

Some conclusions as to the ZFE and its stewardship of democracy: 1) it has been harmful to unconstrained discourse, 2) consequently the ability of the United States to steer a new more rational course has been prevented, and 3) the outcome could very well be the collapse of the United States from debauchery of the currency produced by wars unfunded by taxation, since this would immediately render Israel centric policy unpopular.

Epilogue: On the history channel there was a documentary, Third Reich Rise and Fall, that provided film documentation of post World War II Germany. Some very interesting home movie footage showed everyday German life. In one segment G.I.s marched German civilians through the death camps to make them confront their nation’s crimes against humanity. Distraught Germans often pleaded “they lied to us.” I have often wondered whether that will be the refrain of Americans that “they lied to us,” when forced to confront their own war crimes. Meaning you imagined a social movement that worked closely with the SS and shared similar racial beliefs (e.g., note the present day apartheid in Israel) to tell the truth? Just a thought.

Leaders that are news from nowhere Fourth Reich Arriveswith

Leaders that are news from nowhere


Fourth Reich Arrives

with nary a complaint


Part III

Just before the U.S. invasion of Iraq in March 2003 the two most powerful families in the world, the Rothschilds and Rockefellers merged to form an investment partnership.  They call it investment, but what it amounts to is manufacturing the conditions, and then using the inside information to profit long or short from the mischief.   The super rich do not speculate, they attempt to arrange outcomes—monetarily and politically. 

This is accomplished from their control over the money supply, and in the case of 1930’s Germany and post 2008 America their control over dictatorial or executive power.  I would argue strongly that a president with the power to assassinate U.S. citizens without judicial review, the protection of the Fifth Amendment to due process, is unquestionably a dictator.  But I imagine the way the Rothschilds and Rockefellers see it, it is more like the rights of kings—or wannabe monarchs.  The problem obviously being that their putative subjects do not recognize grubby capitalists as royalty.

The plan announced in the Project for the New American Century, the introduction of a new world order through a series of wars (i.e., just replace Poland and Czechoslovakia with Iraq and Afghanistan) is unmistakably reminiscent of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf.  Of course these were not the plans of the Neo-Cons, George W. Bush, or Barack Obama any more than the poorly educated Hitler penned Mein Kampf, but more likely the objectives of the two most powerful/wealthy families in the world, the Rothschilds and Rockefellers.1  

The net worth of both families are in the trillions, and they are much more akin to being giant corporations, consequently I will refer to them as Rockefeller Inc. and Rothschild Inc.  This is the sine qua non of fascism, corporate control of the government.  The obviously advantage of this form of social organization is that corporations can be awarded government contracts, bailouts, and bail-ins at taxpayer expense.   Which is to say there can be a transfer of wealth from the populace to the corporate entity, through the means of extraeconomic coercion or taxation.  That is, such sleights of hand as Obama’s “individual mandate.”

The same pair, Rothschild Inc. and Rockefeller Inc. (R&R), monopolized oil distribution and price with the help of Russian Bolsheviks (Lenin, Trotsky, and Stalin) in the early 20th century.  Indeed, it was a fact that Hitler’s SS was in large part funded by I.G. Farben a subsidiary of Standard Oil—i.e., the Rockefellers.  Other Wall Street investors were also members of Heinrich Himmler’s inner circle, that morphed from predominantly German industrialists in the early years of Nazism to Jewish finance capital from Wall Street. 

And not surprisingly, Zionists came to have access to Himmler who was himself a Crypto-Jew.  This in part was revealed in 1941 Senate hearings that I.G. Farben and Rockefeller had formed a cartel for oil byproducts.  Mention of it is also detailed in Dietrich Bronder’s book Bevor Hitler Kam, the fact of Himmler’s Jewish heritage.  Indeed when you understand that Zionists inhabited the upper reaches of the Nazi Party the “Night of the Long Knives” makes perfect sense, it was a putsch of the Nazi Party machinery originally developed by Ernst Roehm and Anton Drechsler.  It was indeed Roehm that made the Sturm Abteilung (SA) a force to be reckoned with.  And never forget, Roehm favored the redistribution of wealth in Germany.  In point of fact, it was the SS and Himmler that carried out the murders.

Where Hitler came a cropper of his erstwhile Wall Street banker benefactors was when he chose to issue his own currency.  Then he received the same fate that Saddam Hussein and Moammar Kadhafi would suffer sixty years later.  The R&R again mobilized Russia against him.  Recognizing this retaliation, Hitler invaded Russia but a second front was simply too much for the German economy.  He was again caught between a rock and a hard place, between Russia and the United States.

The many Neo-CONS, i.e., Zionists that infiltrated both the George W. Bush and Barack Obama administrations requires closer scrutiny by the main stream press, but do not because as shown previously the MSM is to a large extent controlled by Crypto-Zionists (people who claim democracy as their mantra but support autocracy), as is book publishing, and Hollywood.  As Coleen Rowley notes it was the Neo-CONS that urged U.S. support of the Chechnyan insurgency. 

A list of executives, directors, and owners of the MSM was given in “Do the Jews run the main stream media?”  Readers might also wish to review an earlier post entitled “Zionist command/control economy=Zionist Fourth Estate.” 

The danger is the close working relationship Zionists had with members of the Nazi Party, in particular Heinrich Himmler and Reinhard Heydrich discussed in a previous post entitled,  “Stockman’s 8 point plan for restoring financial order . . . will never happen.” 

It also suggests a split between assimilated Jews like Walther Rathenau, who thought of themselves first and foremost as patriotic Germans, and world Jewery or Zionists that placed establishment of a Jewish homeland as job number one.  Zionists, however, do not have to be Jewish.  For example, Richard Cheney and Donald Rumsfeld are Zionists, as was former CIA Director James Woolsey.  Assimilationists were an impediment to the settlement project, or rather ordinary main street Jews that had prospered mightily in Germany, and refused to pack up and leave for sunny Palestine.  German general Horst Hoyer stationed in Poland went on the record to set it straight:

From July 1941 to march 1943, I was chief administrator (German: “Vorgesetzter”) of some 250,000 Jews, officially organized as the German Four Year War Effort.  Our orders included manufacturing army clothing, processing scrap metals, captured war materials and the like.  These Jews were paid volunteers.  To secure smooth operations, I had to trust “my Jews” as head of departments and keepers of logs.  Through them I was informed of all world happenings, even on an hourly basis.  This was, for me, incomprehensible and even fantastic.  Thus, I got insights which left me speechless, for “my Jews” knew full well, what world Jewry had in store for them and they were as helpless as the German people themselves.–A DOCUMENT AS TO THE MUTUALITY OF GUILT IN THE FINAL SOLUTION OF THE JEWISH QUESTION  by SS Lieutenant General Horst Hoyer,  he supervised some 250,000 interned Jews near Lemburg, Poland.

There was a split in the Jewish German community, specifically over Palestine.  What they called assimilationist then, Zionists call today “self hating Jews.”  But the idea was simple: force the assimilationists off the reservation and into Palestine.  Now I would even argue Jews in America will be given some sort of gentle persuasion to move.  That is the whole purpose of the “Don’t be American campaign,” and Obama’s deconstruction of the Bill of Rights.  Again, Rockefeller after the anti-trust action, hated nationalism.  You can see why the Rockefellers and Bilderberg Group have found common cause with the Zionists that detest assimilation.

As discussed above, Jews had actually infiltrated the Nazi Party and in particular the SS.  Both Himmler and Heydrich being of Jewish heritage or Crypto-Jews.  This would also explain why many Jews were travelling freely on Aryan passports during World War II.  There are two sources for this information, vigorously suppressed by Jews today: 1) Dietrich Bronder’s book “Bevor Hitler Kam,” 1964, and the Office of Strategic Services’ report on the “Mind of Hitler” published in 1972 by profiler/psychiatrist Walter Langer.  This was an intelligence report assembled in 1943/44.  Bronder’s book as far as I know continues to be banned in Germany.  But Langer’s book, based upon official U.S. intelligence, reported the following:

“Maria Anna Schicklgruber was living in Vienna at the time she conceived. At that time she was employed as a servant in the home of Baron Rothschild. As soon as the family discovered her pregnancy she was sent back to her home in Spital where Alois was born. If it is true that one of the Rothschilds is the real father of Alois Hitler, it would make Adolf a quarter Jew. According to these sources, Adolf Hitler knew of the existence of this document and the incriminating evidence it contained. In order to obtain it he precipitated events in Austria and initiated the assassination of [Austrian Chancellor Engelbert] Dollfuss. According to this story, he failed to obtain the document at that time since Dollfuss had secreted it and had told Schuschnigg of its whereabouts so that in the event of his death the independence of Austria would remain assured. Several stories of this general character are in circulation. (Langer, The Mind of Adolf Hitler, p.107).”

Hitler one quarter Jewish by heredity? Alois Hitler being Adolf’s father, and consequently a direct relative of Baron von Rothschild.  This Rothschild most likely being Solomon Mayer Rothschild.  And according to the OSS apparently Hitler was aware of that connection.  But more importantly was he aware of his possible relation to Baron von Rothschild or even better, was he made aware of it by a third party.  Dear reader compare the above narrative to my reports on the connection between John D. Rockefeller, Jr., and Madelyn Dunham, Barack Obama’s grandmother.

Barack Obama’s great great grandparents on his maternal side was Rolla Charles Payne. Mr. Payne lived on a farm, but didn’t actually farm, making a comfortable living from leasing oil rights on his land. One of his business acquaintances was none other than John D. Rockefeller Jr., heir to the Standard Oil empire. What kept the Rockefellers from getting any bigger, if that’s possible, was nationalist anti-trust legislation. But I digress. Mr. Payne not only leased oil rights, but he also kept accounting books for Rockefeller, Jr. At the time of his association with Mr. Rockefeller, Mr. Payne and Leona Belle McCurry either had a child or came into possession of a child. This child was Madelyn Payne Dunham, Obama’s grandmother, who ultimately became a banker. So you might see what I’m talking about, I place side by side a photograph of John D. Rockefeller Jr., and Madelyn Dunham.<2>


This is political clout. The type required to propel a green horn politician to the presidency or an unknown Austrian wannabe artist to the Chancellorship of Germany. It in particular explains the inundation of the White House with Bilderberg members as the SS was riddled with Zionists, and the Nazi hierarchy with Jews. 

Today it is U.S. obsession with Iran.  Then it was German assimilationism  and now the open attack upon American nationalism.  Since it was precisely such nationalism that produced the anti-trust legislation defanging megalomaniacs like the Rockefellers, and their quest for world dictatorship.

It was discovered, to repeat myself, that Rockefeller and I.G. Farben had signed a secret agreement to merge prior to WWII.  Indeed now they have done so again just before the Iraq war.  Recall further that I.G. Farben was also the producer of Zyklon B used to gas Jews held at Auschwitz. In point of fact, Auschwitz was a 100 percent owned subsidiary of I.G. Farben, and therefore also part of Standard Oil.  And you’re telling me Wall Street investors that gave freely to the SS didn’t know about such perfidy? 

It beggars credulousness. Never forget the Rockefellers threatened revenge for American anti-trust legislation that thwarted their world ambitions.  It has taken them a century, but I believe they are on the cusp of making good on that threat.  Better yet they have convinced fools like Bilderberg attendees that “autodetermination,” and “supranational sovereignty” are the waves of the New World Order.

If that wasn’t enough of a smoking gun, Bernhard von Lippe was an employee of I.G. Farben (1935), and with David Rockefeller founded the now infamous Bilderberg Group after World War II that has supplied the lion’s share of cabinet appointments in the Obama administration. Now the Wizards of Oz behind the scenes have Iran in their cross hairs, but for what else? Oil.  To take oil off the market and keep prices high, and to keep them from selling their oil in anything other than dollars.  The same ruse the Rothschilds and Rockefellers applied at the turn of the 20th century in Baku Azerbaijan.  Again carried out by their anti-democratic vassals the Crypto-Zionists.

The ancillary objective is to degrade and destroy Western Civilization, by deconstructing nationalism country by country and impose a technocratic dictatorship unaccountable to anyone except its wealthy paymasters.  Mario Draghi of the European Central Bank is the role model for this monetary mercenary.  But when you remove the sophistry of “autodetermination” it amounts to nothing more than class warfare. “Supranational sovereignty” another word for unaccountability.  Stooges like Hitler and Obama are merely shills in the grand shell game.

What is going on now is what was going on prior to World War II in Germany. That is, the Nazis wished to destroy German nationalism (i.e., assimilation) and force Jews from Germany to a newly created state in Palestine. It is like using the moniker of Neoconservative, when you are neither conservative nor new. Or even better yet, the Federal Reserve which is in reality a cartel of private banks.

Not only did the Schutzstaffel tour Palestine with the Zionists, but the Zionists offered to form a military alliance with the Nazis during World War II in the Middle East. They not only hated the Protestant ethic, but equally that of Orthodox Judaism.  Few understand that Orthodox Judaism with its aversion to the occult may very well be the Zionists greatest threat. 

This is what new world order must mean, the destruction of the old order, which also means Orthodox Jews, and what appears to be change for the sake of change.  Though this writer would argue everything is in motion, but nothing is fundamentally changing, like the policies from Bush to Obama.  Something, the Neocons and Alexander Kojéve share in common.  Or today, “change you can believe in.”  But it is consistent with Judaism that God is omnipotent and can change his (following the Torah that is) mind, meaning that you must change your mind.  Or in this case when R&R changes their minds, you must change your minds.

As Himmler, Goering, and even Hitler was not what they appeared. Neither is Obama, Kerry or the other Bilderbergers that now inhabit the White House. It has been a complete coup d’etat by followers of Frankist Jews, Jews that actually despise the religion of Judaism. Take the Frankist case of John Kerry who is really not a Catholic Irish, but in reality whose name is Kohn. The Zionist masters of deception are tools of the Rockefellers and Rothschilds, as were Lenin, Trotsky, and Stalin. 

And what about Obama? Obama was a junior senator from the state of Illinois without a legislative achievement to his name when he became surprisingly the President of the United States.  He was a political dark horse in the same vein as Hitler.  Not only that, but Mr. Obama was telling folks as far back as the 1990s that he was destined to become president of the country.

In a sworn affidavit a Chicago area mailman Allen Hulton recounted a meeting he had with Barack Obama in front of the residence of Thomas Ayers, a family on his route in Glen Ellyn Illinois, directly west of Chicago. In this encounter, sometime in the early 1990s, Mr. Hulton recounts his conversation with a young black man with noticeably big ears.

In the course of this conversation, Mr. Hulton says the young man blurted out he was to be president of the United States. Not something most people say in a casual conversation with a stranger. Obviously the idea of a black president isn’t something most Americans would have even entertained, prior to Mr. Obama’s election in 2008.

Why was Mr. Obama in the 1990s so confident of this outcome?  I think the answer lies in a buried past among his relatives.  Do the Rothschilds and Rockefellers keep track of all their wayward illegitimate children and relatives to be used as Crpto-Politicos?  Even the clueless documentary film maker Michael Moore finally had to admit that Mr. Obama was worse than George W.

1. Inexplicably, Hitler received the Iron Cross second class in 1914 and the Iron Cross 1st class in 1918, though the latter was rarely given out to enlisted soldiers.  He received his first award after only serving a couple month in the Imperial Army.  Secondly, Mein Kampf is attributed to Hitler, but from what I know of his secondary school work, he was not a good student, and indeed dropped out of secondary school before his certification.  In short, it is this observer’s opinion that someone was padding Hitler’s resume, not unlike awarding Barack Obama a plum academic position at the University of Chicago School of Law or his suspect Nobel Peace Prize award.  Though even members of Obama’s own party took issue with his claim to being a law professor.  Phil Singer, a campaign aide to Hillary Clinton in 2008 remarked of Obama, “Sen. Obama has often referred to himself as ‘a constitutional law professor’ out on the campaign trail. He never held any such title. And I think anyone, if you ask anyone in academia the distinction between a professor who has tenure and an instructor that does not, you’ll find that there is … you’ll get quite an emotional response.”  Indeed.  The same guy without a significant piece of introduced legislation to his name then becomes president of the United States?  This writer is curious to say the least.


2. “How a green horn becomes president . . . maybe?” (The Darkerside,March 1, 2013).

Tamerlan Tsarnaev: before and after



Zionist Fourth Reich

Has Arrived

Sieg Heil!

crimes are crimes mugshot button




Taken into custody


After arrest

Boston bomber death

As the arrest video makes clear, Tamerlan Tsarnaev was able to walk and does not appear to be bleeding.  (If the corpse picture is shown in the the initial video screen, Google has changed it and you will have to consult the post two stories up).   The bottom photo documents his body at the hospital, beaten beyond recognition.  The large gash along his left rib cage is not visible in the arrest video.

Mr. Tsarnaev was Dornered.  The LAPD established the template to be followed in law enforcement across the country.  Christopher Dorner was also labeled a domestic terrorist.  This is Obama’s strategy to extend the definition of enemy combatants to American citizens, and in this case the use of troops breaches the Posse Comitatus Act forbidding the use of troops in police actions against American citizens.

Under the lawless rule of Barack Obama this is what America has descended,  Vigilantism, and the abrogation of due process and summary executions. 

Hell, Mr. President why don’t we just bring back lynching?

Evidence vs. ungrounded assertion; Tsarnaev murdered while in

Evidence vs. ungrounded assertion; Tsarnaev murdered while in custody



Tsarnaev study

Photo of Tamerlan in left panel.

Photo of man taken into custody in Watertown in right panel.  I will now go on record: they are the same, barring that Tsarnaev had a twin brother to which I am not aware.

Conclusion: Federal Bureau of Investigation is lying; Watertown police is lying.  Tamerlan Tsarnaev was murdered while in the custody of law enforcement.  ABC News is lying and complicit to a murder and its cover-up.

Just say no to barbarism!

Tamerlan Tsarnaev: before and after

Zionist Fourth Reich

Has Arrived

Sieg Heil!

crimes are crimes mugshot button


Taken into custody


After arrest

Boston bomber death

As the arrest video makes clear, Tamerlan Tsarnaev was able to walk and does not appear to be bleeding.  (If the corpse picture is shown in the the initial video screen, Google has changed it and you will have to consult the post two stories up).   The bottom photo documents his body at the hospital, beaten beyond recognition.  The large gash along his left rib cage is not visible in the arrest video.

Mr. Tsarnaev was Dornered.  The LAPD established the template to be followed in law enforcement across the country.  Christopher Dorner was also labeled a domestic terrorist.  This is Obama’s strategy to extend the definition of enemy combatants to American citizens, and in this case the use of troops breaches the Posse Comitatus Act forbidding the use of troops in police actions against American citizens.

Under the lawless rule of Barack Obama this is what America has descended,  Vigilantism, and the abrogation of due process and summary executions.

Hell, Mr. President why don’t we just bring back lynching?