Who are they trying to kid? Our dear government is preparing for World War III. The Massive Ordnance Aerial Bomb was designed for Iran’s underground nuclear facilities. Testing it in Afghanistan was nothing more than another Hiroshima and Nagasaki. All part of the bankster Illuminati plans to cull world population and install a new version of neofeudalism centered around debt and labor obligations to service said debt. And indeed if you wish to end the fossil fuel era, just destroy and nuclear contaminate oil reserves for thousands of years. But the current nonsense and subterfuge is the resurrection of our plans in 2012:
Meanwhile on Capitol Hill, Congress is pushing for tougher measures aimed at crippling the Iranian economy, arguing that current U.S. efforts are falling short. Taking matters into their own hands, a bipartisan group of legislators began crafting legislation to impede Iranian companies from buying insurance, exporting goods, and securing foreign financial assistance. “What we’ve done so far has been good, but it is clearly not enough,” concludes Howard Berman, ranking Democrat on the House Foreign Affairs Committee. “The pressure has to intensify.”—Stewart Patrick, The Atlantic, July 17, 2012.
Meaning the coming nuclear holocaust, signals that the neoconservatives have once again seized control of U.S. foreign policy. As anyone who follows international laws knows economic sanctions alone that harm the general populace of a country is an act of war. Such as this observation by Franklin Lamb, Foreign Policy Journal, July 14, 2012:
The US-led sanctions violate international humanitarian law due to the negative health effects of the sanctions on the civilian populations. This renders the sanctions illegal under international customary law and the UN Charter for their disproportionate damage caused to Iran’s civilian population.
The sanctions are of course designed to destroy Iran’s economy. So what about the economic sanctions on Russia? Lamb correctly notes,
The US-led sanctions amount to an Act of War given their effects including hardships on the general public and that Iran therefore has a legal right to self-defense including closing the Straits of Hormuz.
And what straits will the Russians close—if not the criminal regime in the Ukraine installed by neoconservative Victoria Nuland who formerly worked for our State Department? But of course this is precisely what the United States wants, for Iran to close the Strait of Hormuz and Putin to push back in the Ukraine. T, o provide the pretext for regime change. Now where have we seen these tactics before? You might have answered in Iraq, and you would be correct. You might have replied before World War II, the U.S. engaged in economic acts of war upon Japan to cripple its acquisition of oil, as the present oil embargo is designed to prevent Iran from selling their oil to other countries, or perhaps the banksters attacks upon the ruble in the foreign exchange markets. And by the way, that also is a violation of international law, because:
Unilateral US sanctions are illegal under International Law because they are in fact multilateral and impose penalties on any country which opposes the sanctions or does not choose to participate in them.
Now, Howard Berman the former Congressman from California is Jewish. That is a fact. The last time the Jewish community got together to slap economic sanctions upon an adversary was before World War II. The sanctions obviously did not prevent that war, but hastened its onset. This was the point of the following sanctions:
March 24, 1933
The Jewish community was spoiling for a fight in pre-war Germany, and they got what they wanted . . . and a little more to boot. To say the least, the German people were offended that Jews around the world would attempt to destroy their economy. I guess Berman believes if you continue to do the same thing you’re going to get a different result. I think not. The Zionists were irresponsible in 1916, and 1933. And their track record will be a perfect three for three, because like the irresponsible tactics that they applied to Germany, in Iran there is an established population of Jews. Jews who have lived peacefully with the Iranians and Persians since biblical times. .
The Zionists don’t know where or when to stop with their belligerence, and then they complain when their adversary returns the favor in spades. But this is all erased or effaced from history since it is politically incorrect, like the fact Charles Lindbergh gave an important antiwar speech on September 11, 1941 about going to war with Germany. That talk was delivered in Des Moines Iowa. Lindbergh stated the obvious:
The three most important groups who have been pressing this country toward war are the British, the Jewish and the Roosevelt administration.
Lindbergh goes on concerning Jewish bias:
Their greatest danger to this country lies in their large ownership and influence in our motion pictures, our press, our radio and our government.
I am not attacking either the Jewish or the British people. Both races, I admire. But I am saying that the leaders of both the British and the Jewish races, for reasons which are as understandable from their viewpoint as they are inadvisable from ours, for reasons which are not American, wish to involve us in the war.
We cannot blame them for looking out for what they believe to be their own interests, but we also must look out for ours. We cannot allow the natural passions and prejudices of other peoples to lead our country to destruction.
Yep, I reckon. Ol’ Lindy was right. As they were before World War II, the agitators for war like the Neocons are not advancing American interests but the predilections of foreigners. Why this writer supports people like Ron Paul. Folks who take seriously the warnings of our forefathers like John Quincy Adams. Indeed, we have abandoned the wisdom and prudence of people like Washington and Adams since the globalists took control of the American government. The coming war with Iran does not meet the smell test, nor serve American interests, just as Lindbergh maintained. But the stakes could not be any higher. Because war with Iran or Syria will mean a direct confrontation with Russia. This indeed epitomizes the recklessness of today’s Jewish community. A total lack of moral maturity to place their self absorbtion with Israel’s national security above humanity’s. That is a very dangerous game.