This from the New York Times:
The F.B.I. is leading the investigations, aided by the National Security Agency, the C.I.A. and the Treasury Department’s financial crimes unit. The investigators have accelerated their efforts in recent weeks but have found no conclusive evidence of wrongdoing, the officials said. One official said intelligence reports based on some of the wiretapped communications had been provided to the White House.–MICHAEL S. SCHMIDT, MATTHEW ROSENBERG, ADAM GOLDMAN and MATT APUZZO, JAN. 19, 2017
A grand Democrat strategy of discrediting Donald J. Trump, and undermining his political legitimacy. And Mr. Trump should have realized that by keeping on James Comey as FBI Director, he was allowing a globalist mole within his administration. Very poor strategic thinking. He needed to clean house and remove the globalists within his government. Recall, Mr. Trump that Comey should have brought charges against Hillary Clinton for failing to secure her email server, which could be used to pass along classified information to states like Israel (with plausible deniability), in obvious violation of America’s Federal Records Act and Section 1924 of Title 18, which covers the destruction of such records. In fact, it could have bordered on violations of our espionage act. Dear Mr. Trump, the more the Democrats reiterate their claims of Russian collusion, like Joseph Goebbels, the more the claim will be taken as fact by an uncritical public. Though totally unsupported by anything other than hot air, it is a politically shrewd strategy. The Big Lie as Goebbels and Hitler showed does work. Though I personally fail to see how it will attract anyone other than socialists and communists to the Democrat globalist cause. They cannot square globalism with the offshoring of American jobs and their stab in the back of American workers. And the Democrats cannot win solely with so-called progressives (i.e., intellectual socialists and communists) in a general election. The irony of course being, you have a bunch of Democratic socialists and communists without an actual vanguard of rank and file workers. Marx would have to howl at such nonsense. Or in Marx’s own lingo, do you really think liberals can be the historical subject of history?